Never miss an update

VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Mismatched stitching/grommets, outer soles, and tags on back
Country/Region of Manufacture: United Kingdom Material: Leather
Style: Ankle Boots Color: brown mustard
Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.) Brand: Dr. Martens
US Shoe Size (Women's): 6
Never miss an update

VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf - www.blurrypron.com

    VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf
    VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf
    FRYE 17" KNEE TALL BOOTS GREAT COND FEW TIMES USED 5 MOTORCYCLE MADE IN SPAINGentleman/Lady ECCO Womens Snow Boot- Pick SZ/Color. New varieties are launched Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad Lightweight shoesNew DANNER Mountain Low 600 Women's 8 Gray / Plum Hiking Boot RETAIL 62264 $160PAUL SMITH WOMEN'S RUBBER SWIRL PRINT RAIN BOOTS SIZE US 7.5NIB $298 Frye Celia Shearling Genuine Fur Black Leather Boots sz 7 MThe North Face Womens Shellista II Mid Boot - Dachshund Brown/Demitasse Brown 6FRYE Lindsay Knee High Boots Leather Women's 11 BrownTORY BURCH Black Leather Block Heel Booties w/ Elastic Sides Sz 8.5 , Cole Haan Rockland Tall Boots Black Womens Shoes Size 5 M Boots MSRP $300GEOX ILLUSION A SMO.LE+SYNT.LE SNEAKERS sale d4454aDonald J Pliner Gisele Napa Stretch Womens Shoes Boots High Black Bootie 8 1/2 MWomens Dr Martens Pascal Black Virginia Leather 8 Eyelet Ankle Boots Shu Size , Tony Bianco $219 DIDDY Black Velvet Booties 8Frye Vintage Butterfly Beige W/ Green Cowboy Boots Ladies Size 6.5M , Cole Haan Leather Ankle Boot Size 10 $398 , Donald J Pliner Gisele Napa Stretch Womens Shoes Boots High Black Bootie 6 1/2 M , Laura Biagiotti Shoes Women Boots Black 84730 moda1 SALE , WOMENS AQUATALIA BOOTS Kali Water-Resistant Leather Zip Up Ankle Booties 9.5 M , NIB $189 Marc Fisher Escape Tall Boots - Black size 6NEW Tory Burch Womens Grove 100MM Royal Tan Booties Size 6.5 MSRP $450NIB HUNTER Navy Original Tall Gloss Rain Boots Shoes Size US 6Tory Burch Riley Genuine Suede Ankle Boots Tan Tory Burch Riley Bootie Size 8 , Abilene Women's, Dakota Cowhide, Brown Western Bootie, (9 M, Brown) , Salvatore Ferragamo Vintage Saks Fifth Ave Black Leather Knee Boots! Sz 7.5! , C La Canadienne New Dorthea Black Womens Shoes Size 8.5 M Boots MSRP $450 , Free People Brown Leather & Oiled Suede Distressed Ankle Boots Women Size 37 ANB , $375 VIA SPIGA CALEB Brown Leather Designer Knee High Boots 8.5BCBG BCBGMAXAZRIA Womens Adalynn 1 Over The Knee Platform Boot ShoeVia Spiga Filomena Suede Wedge Ankle Boot Size 6 ,
    VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf - www.blurrypron.com>VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf - www.blurrypron.com
    Converse All Star Classic Red Low M9696 ORIGINAL ITALIE 2018 Man WomanPuma Women Vikky Platform Low-Top Sneakers, Beige Pebble, 7 EULadies Clarks Zip Up Waterproof Knee High Leather Boots Style - Mint TreatCARLITA CHARM LADIES CLARKS ZIP LEATHER LONG KNEE HIGH HEELED BOOTS SHOES SIZELoafer Ivanka Trump Weven 2 Light Pink Satin , New M'AMI Black Suede Leather w RHINESTONES Moccasins Size 38 7.5 Made in Italy , Women's Embroidery Flowers Patent Leather Wedge Sneakers Platform Brogue ShoesAravon Women's Barbara Brown Leather Comfort Shoe Size 8.5D D1836/ , PLEASER KISS280/B/M Sexy 6" Stiletto High Heels Black Platform Mary Janes Pumps , Pleaser ADORE-709FS Women's Red Faux Suede High Heel Platform Ankle Strap Sandal , YSL Y. Saint Laurent Blue Suede High Heel Wedge Sandal ~ Sz 41 New-FREE Shipping , MCQ Alexander McQueen Mombassa metallic ankle strap wedge sandals sz 38Nike Marxman (GS) Hi Top Basketball Trainers 833916 600 Sneakers Shoes , PUMA Men's Ferrari Drift Cat Sneaker, - Choose SZ/ColorNEW MEN'S NIKE JORDAN ACE 23 11 644773-008 , Nike Air Max 98 Men's Pure Platinum/Obsidian/Kinetic Green/Sunset Pulse 40744005 , Red Wing Heritage Merchant 6" Brown Ebony Harness Boots - Mens 11 D (8061)Kodiak 417055BLL Mens Vista Waterproof Boot 11D (M) US FAST FREE USA SHIPPING , ZALIN Brown Freckled Grain Leather Mens Ankle Boots Shoes - / US 11 , 3N2 7375-0101-85 Ultimate Indoor Officiating Shoe Black - 8.5 , Dr Martens 3989 Oxfords Distressed Brown Men's Shoes US 11/PUMA Men's KRAFTEK SF Casual Shoes Black 303633-02 a5 Size 7.5 , Retro Mens formal business shoes buckle leopard pointed toe hairdresser fashionECCO Mens Dynamic Moc 2.0 Penny Slip-on Loafer, Denim Blue, 44 EU/10-10.5 M US , New Womens Reebok All Terrain Freedom Running Shoes Size 9 Blue/Grey MSRP $100Romika Mokasso 295 Slipper - Blue Gray , Nike Dunk Sky Hi Sail Blue Hidden Wedge Runner Shoe Sz 7.5 EXCELLENT , New Womens Zip Block Heel Patent Leather Ankle Boots Shoes Plus Sz US4-10.5 FallBLONDO Womens CORAH Waterproof Black Suede Leather Boot US 9.5 M (4022-31)Frye Carson Pull On Dark Brown Size 7 EUC ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf - www.blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf - www.blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS mogochinese-29824 MARTENS BOOTS ~ DR. US 6 - 6.5 Brown Mustard a59fcbf
    Boots
    >
    ;